Friday, October 9, 2015


Turn your Smartphone into a 3D Hologram

In place of a Dark Lord, you would have a queen!?


Gay Researcher Afraid His Discovery Of Gay Genes Will Be Used Inappropriately, Quits Project

Researchers have revealed details of a saliva test that has enabled them to predict the sexual orientation of sets of male twins with 67% accuracy.
The lead researcher, who is gay, is so concerned about the possible consequences of the research that he has now decided to not pursue it further.
Working at University College Los Angeles’ Center for Gender-Based Biology, postdoctoral scholar Tuck C. Ngun and his colleagues have followed up previous research that found that gay brothers share a sequence of five genetic markers in the region of the X chromosome, reports New Scientist.
Other research has also found that there is an increased chance of women giving birth to a son who grows up to be gay with each subsequent male boy born – rising from a 2% chance for her first boy to a 6% chance for a third male child.
It has been theorized that the male pregnancy may leave behind some sort of marker that affects subsequent pregnancies – most likely leading to the addition or subtraction of methyl groups to specific genes. Methyl is a specific type of hydrocarbon molecule group.
Ngun and colleagues looked at the genetic make-up of 47 pairs of male twins; 37 sets of twins were both gay, while the other ten sets differed in their sexuality. They also analyzed the genes of heterosexual and homosexual volunteers.
They specifically looked at methylation patterns between gene codes.
They found several genetic sites of interest – one of which has previously been identified as having an influence on sexual orientation.
Ngun presented his findings yesterday at the University of Baltimore in Maryland at the 2015 meeting of the American Society of Human Genetics.
He said that having identified a particular gene code of interest, the team took things further and tested whether some of the twins were gay or straight based on the methylation patterns of their genes. They found their results to be accurate 67% of the time.
The findings have yet to have been published in a peer-review journal.
New Scientist has said that other researchers are extremely cautions of the results – particularly as the testing was carried out on a specific sample of the population; male twins.
‘Studies that associate biomarkers with particular traits are notoriously prone to false positive results due to the tendency of these studies to find spurious associations that are down to sheer chance,’ said Johnjoe McFadden, molecular geneticist at the University of Surrey, UK.
‘The nub of the problem with studies like these is that when you see methylation changes, you don’t know whether methylation is the prime event or if it’s reflecting some other event. Methylation might be reflecting a state rather than driving it,’ added Gavin Kelsey, an epigeneticist at the Babraham Institute in Cambridge, UK.
Darren Griffin, professor of genetics at the University of Kent, told the Western Daily Press, ‘To claim a 70% predictive value of something as complex as homosexuality is bold indeed. I wait with bated breath for a full peer-reviewed article.
‘While there is strong evidence in general for a biological basis for homosexuality my personal impression has always been one of a multiple contributory factors, including life experiences.’
Psychologist Michael J. Bailey of Northwestern University told the Los Angeles Times that although genes are likely to affect a man’s sexuality, the fact that identical twin pairs can contain gay and straight brothers would, ‘conclusively suggest that genes don’t explain everything.’
Ngun, who is himself gay, has expressed caution over the implications of the research – to the extent that he has decided to abandon the research for the time being.
‘I’ve always wondered why I am the way I am. But once you have this information, you can’t control how it’s used or disseminated.’
He told New Scientist that he was concerned about people potentially wanting to screen developing fetuses for methylated gene markers, even though reproducing the studies with fetuses would be extremely difficult.
‘Assuming the marks were placed early enough in fetal development, the potential for a screening test is there,’ he said, before explaining that these particular gene patterns differ between cells within the same person, and asking, ‘Which embryo cells would correspond to adult saliva?’
Asked if he worried about people abusing the information to punish or persecute gay people, Ngun said, ‘I honestly don’t think it’s that far-fetched.’
‘I just left the lab last week,’ he said, commenting on the fact that he had decided to withdraw from the project.

‘I don’t believe in the censoring of knowledge, but given the potential for misuse of the information, it just didn’t sit well with me.’

Seems Darren Griffin needs some schoolin' in psychology, maybe he should stick to genetic studies instead of offering up a personal "impression" not based on anything other than his uninformed opinion. 
The real question here however, isn't the fact Ngun abandoned his own project, but that he started it in the first place.
It doesn't take any real intelligence to realize that figuring out the gene markers for those prone too being homosexual would be abused.
Somebody give this gay boi a noogie and a heartfelt swift kick in the ass.

Wednesday, October 7, 2015

Gay Bois In Bondage

The Deep Ugly That Has Become Religious Conservatism

Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson compared allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry to requiring that car seats accommodate conjoined twins and anatomically normal children.
Carson made the analogy in his latest book, titled A More Perfect Union.

“Laws and regulations should be designed to address normal situations while providing special mechanisms for the creation of exceptions in abnormal situations. Changing the law governing the normal situation in order to accommodate the abnormal situation is like requiring that car seats be designed to accommodate conjoined twins as well as anatomically normal children,” Carson wrote.
“The more sensible thing would be to require car seats to accommodate typical children and design special car seats for atypical children as needed. This principle can be applied to a host of situations in our nation. For example, most people are heterosexual, and changing the definition of marriage to suit those outside that definition is unnecessarily complicated.”
Earlier this year, Carson vowed to no longer discuss LGBT rights after being widely criticized for claiming that being gay is a choice because prison can make a person gay.

So someone running for President of the United States isn't smart enough to figure out that treating it's citizens equally isn't complicated at all; it only becomes complicated when one side is stumbling over itself trying to figure out a way to still oppress a minority without it actually looking as loathsome, ignorant and bigoted as it really does.
And they let this man operate on people?

Just Another Reason Why I Really Like British Guys

Tuesday, October 6, 2015

Daily Porn...How Reparative Therapy Works (Curing Str8 Bois Everywhere)


Eat More Ass Tuesday

It's The End Of The World Or Just Time For A Shot Of Tequila

Vatican Mentally Abuses And Tortures Gay Men

The Vatican is attempting to ‘cure gay priests’ in a monastery alongside pedophiles and drug addicts, it has been claimed.
Former priests have come forward claiming that those who show ‘inappropriate sexual tendencies’ are sent to a monastery in Trento.
This involves a period of ‘training, personal reflection and enlightenment’.
These claims in the Italian press have emerged after Father Krzysztof Charamsa, a Polish theologian, was sacked after he came out as gay and had a long-term partner.
It also follows a Vatican insider suggesting that 50% of the priests that meet in the Vatican are secretly gay.
Gianluigi Past√≥, the priest in charge at the monastery, has said ‘I can only say that here we help the priests become healthy.
In an interview with La Repubblica, he denied the institution was specifically for gay or pedophile priests but did not deny whether they had come in the past.
He also did not reveal their methods, merely pointing to the website that said they use ‘various types of therapy’.
A Vatican spokesman said: ‘There is no comment.’

‘Gay cure’ therapy is considered to be extremely harmful, both mentally and physically, by the World Health Organization and they have advised that it should not be attempted by anyone. Such ‘treatments’ range from prayer therapy to electric shock torture.

Monday, October 5, 2015

Daily Porn...Pig Boi Loves Big Raw Dick


To The Victor

Fight For The Right