“More than a year ago, when states
began to legalize gay marriage, I argued that polygamy would be the
natural result,” Ablow
wrote. “If love between humans of legal age is the only
condition required to have the state issue a marriage license, then
it is irrational to assert that two men or two women can have such
feelings for one another, while three women and a man, or two men and
a woman, cannot.”
The decision “will officially make
marriage the Wild West.”
“Marriage is over.”
“It was always at least a little
funny that a huge percentage of people swore to stay together until
death, then divorced and remarried.”
“But, now, it is, officially,
judicially, a joke.”
“If two men can marry, and three men
can marry, and five women and a man can marry, and three men and two
women can marry, then marriage has no meaning.”
Media Matters' Carlos Maza argued that
Ablow was misrepresenting the facts in the ruling to increase
opposition to marriage equality.
“Like many right-wing commentators
hoping to cite the Utah case as an example of the consequences of
marriage equality, Ablow failed to mention that polygamous marriage
is still illegal in Utah,” Maza
wrote. “Waddoups' decision decriminalized polygamous
relationships, but polygamists in Utah, as in the rest of the
country, are still limited to one marriage license at a time.
Waddoups' decision cited a significant pro-gay Supreme Court
decision, Lawrence v. Texas, but it didn't rely on court
decisions legalizing same-sex marriage to conclude that polygamous
families in Utah should be free to arrange their private personal
relationships in whichever way they choose. In fact, the kind of
cohabitation legalized in the Utah decision has been legal in most of
the United States for many years.”
So, Mr. Albow (note I didn't call him Doctor, because he doesn't deserve the title) explain how gay marriage has accomplished this task?
Isn't it the truth, that the heterosexual exclusive institution of marriage, has been in decline for decades, all of which transpired well before the recent (last couple of years) homosexual inclusions of marriage?
Best if one looks in the mirror for the failed marriages of heterosexual unions than blaming it on the recent marriages of homosexuals.
Then again, you profess to be a conservative Christian, so I think we can make a more *informed* opinion on what your *real* motives are.
In the end, Mr. Albow, not one word of what you speak has any validation nor can it be supported with anything resembling any factual case studies.
Seriously, you bigots really need to learn a new tune.
No comments:
Post a Comment