Kentucky Governor Steve Beshear, a
Democrat, has defended arguments used in defending the state's ban on
gay marriage.
The state's arguments have been
criticized as “absurd” and “irrational.”
On Tuesday, U.S. District Court Judge
John G. Heyburn II dismissed the arguments as “not those of serious
people.”
In response to plaintiffs' motion for
summary judgment, Beshear's hired counsel argued that Kentucky's ban was
needed to protect the human race and was “consistent with sound
economic policy.”
“It is axiomatic that procreation is
vital to continuation of the human race and that only man-woman
couples can naturally procreate,” the brief states. “Encouraging,
promoting, and supporting the formation of relationships that have
the natural ability to procreate furthers the Commonwealth's
fundamental interest in ensuring humanity's continued existence.”
“The continued expansion of the
population through stable birth rate growth fosters long-term
economic stability, unquestionably a valid state interest. One need
look no further than economic journals and news sources to see the
correlation between a society's birth rates and its long term ability
to support a strong economy.”
Beshear was asked to respond to the
criticism at an unrelated press conference.
“The job of the lawyers on both sides
is to get every argument out in front of the court so they can make a
reasonable decision,” he
answered.
He also declined to state his personal
stance on marriage equality.
“My sole purpose for filing this
appeal is that every Kentuckian deserves to get an answer on this
very difficult and controversial issue,” Beshear said. “Whatever
the law of the land is, Kentucky is going to abide by it.”
Judge Heyburn was correct in his dismissal that these arguments are absurd and irrational...every bit of their argument revolves around everyone in the state having to get gay married and not producing children.
Reads more like an hysterical tantrum than a legal brief.
No comments:
Post a Comment