Friday, August 5, 2011
Russia’s Best-Known Gay Activist Has an Uphill Fight
At first glance, it seemed like a breakthrough for homosexual equality in Russia. After years of battling the authorities, here was Nikolai Alekseyev, Russia’s most visible gay-rights campaigner, on a popular prime-time debate show called “Duel” recently talking about plans to hold a gay pride rally in Moscow.
But the discussion quickly deteriorated, with hostile and bigoted remarks coming not just from Mr. Alekseyev’s opponents but also from the host, who at one point equated homosexuality with pedophilia. When a woman in a Kentucky Derby-style hat started into a screed about “homosexual extremism,” he had had enough.
Calling the woman a lying “hag in a hat,” Mr. Alekseyev charged offstage, stamping a hole through the set as he left.
Any conversation about gay rights in Russia today is bound to be tense. But with Mr. Alekseyev, it can be explosive.
For six years, he has flouted a government ban and held an annual gay-rights event that he calls Moscow Pride. He has weathered arrests and attacks by neo-Nazi thugs, and once got into a shoving match with the press secretary of Yuri M. Luzhkov, the former Moscow mayor who has referred to Mr. Alekseyev’s protests as “satanic.”
With short blond hair and a round, youthful face, Mr. Alekseyev, 33, has the air of a maligned schoolboy out for retribution. He decided to become an activist after Moscow State University, where he was enrolled, refused to accept his graduate thesis, “Legal Regulation of the Status of Sexual Minorities.”
He is brash and provocative, even among would-be supporters. He has berated journalists for coverage he disagrees with.
“He is a complicated person and does not have a mild personality,” said Anna Komarova, a transgender activist allied with Mr. Alekseyev. “But laid-back people choose other occupations.”
BEING a gay-rights activist in Russia is not for the timid. At this year’s Moscow Pride, held outside the Kremlin last month, the two dozen or so participants stood little chance against the phalanx of police officers deployed to stop them. Most were arrested seconds after unfurling a rainbow flag or a placard denouncing homophobia. Gangs of muscular men wearing surgical masks and yelling antigay slurs chased away the rest.
Participants suffered only minor cuts and bruises, and all were released the same day. Mr. Alekseyev, who spent this year’s protest coordinating from an apartment — his father was recently found to have cancer, he said, and he could not risk being jailed as a repeat offender — said previous years were bloodier.
Few others in Russia have risked being as publicly outspoken — or just as out — as Mr. Alekseyev. He calls news conferences at fancy Moscow hotels, gives interviews to newspapers and has appeared on television with increasing regularity. He has, for better or for worse, become the face of a budding campaign for gay rights in Russia.
His efforts have attracted news media attention and forced politicians to discuss the issue. But it is a steep uphill battle; asked to weigh in, Vladimir V. Putin, Russia’s prime minister, said homosexuals deepen Russia’s demographic crisis. And Russia joined many African and Muslim-majority countries on Friday in voting against a United Nations resolution condemning discrimination against homosexuals that, nevertheless, passed.
Mr. Alekseyev, who founded the group Gay Russia in 2005, believes that there can be no advance in rights until gay people are allowed to protest publicly.
But in a country where the authorities view any sort of public protest with trepidation, his position has provoked hostility.
“This is a very dangerous thing,” said Aleksandr Khinshtein, a member of Parliament, and Mr. Alekseyev’s principal opponent on the recent debate show. “Homosexuality can never be allowed to be considered normal. It’s a question of survival.”
Even other gay-rights campaigners have criticized Moscow Pride, saying the rallies and the violence that typically accompanies them distort perceptions of the issue in Russia, where there is still significant confusion about what homosexuality is and what exactly gay people want.
“He focuses only on these protests,” said Igor Yasin, another Moscow-based gay-rights campaigner. “And when he has the opportunity to explain what he is fighting for, what we are fighting for, it seems as if he’s not able to provide an answer.”
Many Russian gays, however, seem uninterested in the fight. Russia has become a far more open place in the nearly two decades since the authorities repealed a law against male homosexual sex. Gay clubs and bars have opened in many large cities, and the Internet has helped others in small towns to connect. In Moscow, there is a gay bookstore, a gay beach and even a gay taxi service.
Just hours after Mr. Alekseyev’s latest Moscow Pride protest, the line outside a gay club, Central Station, had spilled onto the street and stretched around a block of downtown Moscow. Squeezed into muscle shirts and tight Prada jeans, the young men joked and flirted, while cabbies, looking a little bored, waited to ferry them to late-night parties.
Such freedoms are limited to what Mr. Yasin described as a “golden cage.” Do what you want, gay-rights opponents say, but do it out of sight.
People who are openly gay can be fired from work with impunity. Discussion of same-sex marriage and gay adoption is largely taboo.
Violence against homosexuals is common, rights advocates say, particularly in small towns and in the mostly Muslim North Caucasus region, rights groups say.
Despite his rising public profile, Mr. Alekseyev says he usually takes the subway and, unlike other prominent activists here, has not felt the need to hire a bodyguard. Still, only a handful of people have been bold enough to push the limits.
“What society wants is bread and spectacle, that’s it,” he said. “I don’t see any problem with people standing in lines outside gay clubs, but tell these people that they have to fight for their rights and they say, ‘No way.’ ”
His efforts have brought notable successes. In 2008, the Ministry of Health eliminated a provision banning homosexuals from donating blood. Last year, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that Russia had violated Mr. Alekseyev’s right to protest and fined the government about $40,000.
Most major Russian newspapers covered the recent Moscow Pride, as did many foreign news outlets. The United States and the European Union issued condemnations of the crackdown.
But it is unclear whether Mr. Alekseyev’s efforts, or those of anyone else, have done much to change Russian attitudes.
Amid a group of men chanting “Beat the homos” at this year’s Moscow Pride, a 21-year-old musician named Vladimir was one of the few onlookers to express any support for the event.
“There are many tolerant people,” he said, adding that he was not gay, but supported gay rights. “But they are probably not tolerant enough to come out here and face this.”
Thursday, August 4, 2011
The Becoming
One of the show's I watch regularly is: "Grey's Anatomy"
This is highlights from an episode from season 4 and dealt with DADT and with a son's fear of a military fathers disapproval. (been there, done that...twice)
It's also one of the few times a show or movie made me cry, yeah, Ulf cried, like a big fuckin' baby.
No matter how many times I watch it, it still get's to me.
I was born in the military, grew up in it, and married a military man, so yeah, this shit bothers me.
Ulf
Disobedient slave boi taught his place
Sometimes, they just need a gentle reminder of whose in charge and who they serve.
Ulf
Wednesday, August 3, 2011
Gay VS. Gay for pay
Here's GAYVN award winner Ricky Sinz getting fucked for his gay fans by another G4P guy.
The second vid is an amateur one from Eric Videos featuring a couple of fags goin' at it.
Now tell me, which one do you find hotter?
Personally, I think Ricky Sinz (for my taste) is hotter than hell and he seems too genuinely want to please his fans and always try's to give a top notch performance.
But, sorry Ricky, two gay guys really gettin' into each other, blast right thru all the studio production values and smokes the big studio porn formula even on an amateur level.
Ulf (I still love you Ricky)
The second vid is an amateur one from Eric Videos featuring a couple of fags goin' at it.
Now tell me, which one do you find hotter?
Personally, I think Ricky Sinz (for my taste) is hotter than hell and he seems too genuinely want to please his fans and always try's to give a top notch performance.
But, sorry Ricky, two gay guys really gettin' into each other, blast right thru all the studio production values and smokes the big studio porn formula even on an amateur level.
Ulf (I still love you Ricky)
BAD PUPPY from byanlx3r on TnaFlix.
erik video RAW from sexmano on TnaFlix.
Anti-Gay NY State Senator: It’s ’War’ on Gay Families
By Kilian Melloy
New York State Sen. Rubén DÃaz, Sr., has declared a "war" against gay and lesbian families in the wake of the state’s first legal same-sex weddings, reported The New Civil Rights Movement on July 25.
The article said that DÃaz "threatened judges who performed same-sex marriages on Sunday in New York, [and] also literally declared war on same-sex married couples in his state, and threatened to have their marriages annulled. Hundreds of same-sex marriages were performed in New York State Sunday, the first day the new marriage equality law went into effect."
"We’re going to show them next week that everything they did today was illegal," DÃaz declared on July 24, the day marriage equality took effect in New York. "Today we start the battle! Today we start the war!"
DÃaz was speaking at a rally that had been put together by the anti-gay group the National Organization for Marriage. His was the only vote from a Democratic state lawmaker against the new marriage equality law. DÃaz is also a Pentecostal minister.
NOM is a Mormon-affiliated group that has spent millions of dollars around the country to roadblock--and, in Maine and California, roll back--the legal rights of gay and lesbian families.
The article went on to say, "DÃaz is known for his strong anti-gay hatred, and his merging of his role as an ordained minister into his elected office, in violation of the constitutional concept of separation of church and state, a concept to which Diaz has said he does not subscribe."
The article also reported that DÃaz and president of NOM, Brian Brown, have been collaborating closely.
There has been some dissent over the issue in DÃaz’s own family. Erica DÃaz was among counter-protestors who showed up at a May 15 rally in Manhattan to counter a NOM-sponsored event that same day in The Bronx.
Rubén DÃaz, Sr. was a leader at that anti-gay rally as well. He has led several similar rallies: Two years ago, as then-Gov. David Paterson pushed for a State Senate vote on a bill that would have extended marriage equality to New York families--a bill already approved on multiple occasions by the State Assembly--DÃaz headed up opposition to the bill.
Erica DÃaz joined her grandfather on the platform where he was speaking. Embracing her, DÃaz told the crowd, "This is my granddaughter, and I love her."
Erica DÃaz told NY 1, "He’s my grandfather and I respect that he’s so firm in what he believes in.
"However, I have my own opinions on this issue," the young woman added. "I believe that everyone deserves a chance to exercise their human rights and marry the person they love."
But on June 5, Erika DÃaz wrote an op-ed for the New York Post in which she said that her grandfather’s silence at one rally in which a fellow cleric called for the deaths of gay people "shattered" her.
Advertisement
"This time it was not his words that hurt me. It was his silence," Erika DÃaz wrote in the June 5 article.
"My grandfather, state Sen. Rev. Ruben Diaz, spoke about marriage equality on a Spanish radio station in April. He was joined on the airwaves by a priest who said, ’Gay people are worthy of death.’
"Papa didn’t say anything. I was shattered," Erika continued. "I am the gay granddaughter of Albany’s most outspoken marriage-equality opponent. Until now, out of love, I closeted my feelings about my family’s patriarch, who has so vehemently denounced gay rights.
"But my grandfather should know that as he continues to skewer the marriage-equality bill on the radio, television and in newspapers, I am listening and reading. And I’ve finally conjured the courage to stand up for what is right."
DÃaz was a speaker at the anti-gay rally Erika referred to. The rally took place in May. DÃaz was preceded as a speaker by Rev. Ariel Torres Ortega, a separate article at The New Civil Rights Movement reported. Ortega declared that gays and bisexuals should be put to death.
"He did not state if he believed this should be coded into law, whom would be the judge, how proof would be obtained, and if this was a stepped program, i.e., if any homosexual act would automatically deserve the death penalty, or if there would be a ’three strikes’ provision," noted the article dryly.
The article’s headline, "Kill the Gays NYC?," referenced a highly controversial bill that was proposed in Uganda by an anti-gay lawmaker there, David Bahati, who has ties to anti-gay American evangelicals.
Under Bahati’s bill, gay men who have sex with other men repeatedly would be executed. HIV positive men who had even a single same-sex encounter would also be killed (though HIV positive heterosexual men would not be punished for sexual contact with women). Moreover, Bahati’s bill provided for steep penalties for anyone knowing about a same-sex relationship but not turning the couple in to the authorities.
The bill has excited intense international condemnation and has not come up for a vote in the Ugandan parliament.
In the United States, acceptance of GLBT individuals and their families has continued to climb, with a recent poll showing a slender majority in support of marriage equality for the first time. But in the wake of marriage parity’s legalization in New York, opponents of full legal equality for GLBTs have grown more vocal.
The response to Texas Gov. Rick Perry, a possible candidate for 2012, saying that he was fine with marriage equality in New York and supported the rights of states to decide on marriage law for themselves was met with a chorus of condemnation; Perry quickly changed his tune, and expressed support for an amendment to the United States Constitution to eradicate marriage parity in the six states where it is now legal and put family parity out of reach of gay and lesbian Americans for years, perhaps generations, to come.
"When I was younger, marriage equality was not an issue for me," Erika DÃaz added in her op-ed piece. "But now, as my grandfather ceaselessly and callously comments on the issue, each and every word stings, since I live with my girlfriend of 2½ years, Naomi Torres, and our two sons, Jared and Jeremiah Munoz.
"This fight is personal."
New York State Sen. Rubén DÃaz, Sr., has declared a "war" against gay and lesbian families in the wake of the state’s first legal same-sex weddings, reported The New Civil Rights Movement on July 25.
The article said that DÃaz "threatened judges who performed same-sex marriages on Sunday in New York, [and] also literally declared war on same-sex married couples in his state, and threatened to have their marriages annulled. Hundreds of same-sex marriages were performed in New York State Sunday, the first day the new marriage equality law went into effect."
"We’re going to show them next week that everything they did today was illegal," DÃaz declared on July 24, the day marriage equality took effect in New York. "Today we start the battle! Today we start the war!"
DÃaz was speaking at a rally that had been put together by the anti-gay group the National Organization for Marriage. His was the only vote from a Democratic state lawmaker against the new marriage equality law. DÃaz is also a Pentecostal minister.
NOM is a Mormon-affiliated group that has spent millions of dollars around the country to roadblock--and, in Maine and California, roll back--the legal rights of gay and lesbian families.
The article went on to say, "DÃaz is known for his strong anti-gay hatred, and his merging of his role as an ordained minister into his elected office, in violation of the constitutional concept of separation of church and state, a concept to which Diaz has said he does not subscribe."
The article also reported that DÃaz and president of NOM, Brian Brown, have been collaborating closely.
There has been some dissent over the issue in DÃaz’s own family. Erica DÃaz was among counter-protestors who showed up at a May 15 rally in Manhattan to counter a NOM-sponsored event that same day in The Bronx.
Rubén DÃaz, Sr. was a leader at that anti-gay rally as well. He has led several similar rallies: Two years ago, as then-Gov. David Paterson pushed for a State Senate vote on a bill that would have extended marriage equality to New York families--a bill already approved on multiple occasions by the State Assembly--DÃaz headed up opposition to the bill.
Erica DÃaz joined her grandfather on the platform where he was speaking. Embracing her, DÃaz told the crowd, "This is my granddaughter, and I love her."
Erica DÃaz told NY 1, "He’s my grandfather and I respect that he’s so firm in what he believes in.
"However, I have my own opinions on this issue," the young woman added. "I believe that everyone deserves a chance to exercise their human rights and marry the person they love."
But on June 5, Erika DÃaz wrote an op-ed for the New York Post in which she said that her grandfather’s silence at one rally in which a fellow cleric called for the deaths of gay people "shattered" her.
Advertisement
"This time it was not his words that hurt me. It was his silence," Erika DÃaz wrote in the June 5 article.
"My grandfather, state Sen. Rev. Ruben Diaz, spoke about marriage equality on a Spanish radio station in April. He was joined on the airwaves by a priest who said, ’Gay people are worthy of death.’
"Papa didn’t say anything. I was shattered," Erika continued. "I am the gay granddaughter of Albany’s most outspoken marriage-equality opponent. Until now, out of love, I closeted my feelings about my family’s patriarch, who has so vehemently denounced gay rights.
"But my grandfather should know that as he continues to skewer the marriage-equality bill on the radio, television and in newspapers, I am listening and reading. And I’ve finally conjured the courage to stand up for what is right."
DÃaz was a speaker at the anti-gay rally Erika referred to. The rally took place in May. DÃaz was preceded as a speaker by Rev. Ariel Torres Ortega, a separate article at The New Civil Rights Movement reported. Ortega declared that gays and bisexuals should be put to death.
"He did not state if he believed this should be coded into law, whom would be the judge, how proof would be obtained, and if this was a stepped program, i.e., if any homosexual act would automatically deserve the death penalty, or if there would be a ’three strikes’ provision," noted the article dryly.
The article’s headline, "Kill the Gays NYC?," referenced a highly controversial bill that was proposed in Uganda by an anti-gay lawmaker there, David Bahati, who has ties to anti-gay American evangelicals.
Under Bahati’s bill, gay men who have sex with other men repeatedly would be executed. HIV positive men who had even a single same-sex encounter would also be killed (though HIV positive heterosexual men would not be punished for sexual contact with women). Moreover, Bahati’s bill provided for steep penalties for anyone knowing about a same-sex relationship but not turning the couple in to the authorities.
The bill has excited intense international condemnation and has not come up for a vote in the Ugandan parliament.
In the United States, acceptance of GLBT individuals and their families has continued to climb, with a recent poll showing a slender majority in support of marriage equality for the first time. But in the wake of marriage parity’s legalization in New York, opponents of full legal equality for GLBTs have grown more vocal.
The response to Texas Gov. Rick Perry, a possible candidate for 2012, saying that he was fine with marriage equality in New York and supported the rights of states to decide on marriage law for themselves was met with a chorus of condemnation; Perry quickly changed his tune, and expressed support for an amendment to the United States Constitution to eradicate marriage parity in the six states where it is now legal and put family parity out of reach of gay and lesbian Americans for years, perhaps generations, to come.
"When I was younger, marriage equality was not an issue for me," Erika DÃaz added in her op-ed piece. "But now, as my grandfather ceaselessly and callously comments on the issue, each and every word stings, since I live with my girlfriend of 2½ years, Naomi Torres, and our two sons, Jared and Jeremiah Munoz.
"This fight is personal."
Prehistoric gay man
By BRIAN BRAIKER
Archaeologists in the Czech Republic have unearthed the grave of what may be the remains of the oldest known homosexual or transgender man.
The prehistoric body dates to the Copper age -- or 2900 to 2500 years ago -- and was buried in a manner that was typically reserved for women.
The male skeleton was found on its side, facing east, and was surrounded by domestic jugs, objects previously seen only in female graves. An oval, egg-shaped container, usually associated with female burials, was also found at the feet of the skeleton.
"From history and ethnology, we know that people from this period took funeral rites very seriously, so it is highly unlikely that this positioning was a mistake," lead archaeologist Kamila Remisova Vesinova told the U.K.'s Telegraph.
Men of the period were buried with weapons -- stone battle axes and flint knives -- none of which were found in the Czech grave.
Vesinova concluded that the grave represents "one of the earliest cases of what could be described as a 'transsexual' or 'third gender grave' in the Czech Republic."
Not everyone is so convinced. Archaeologists in the Czech Republic have unearthed the grave of what may be the remains of the oldest known homosexual or transgendered man.
"He's clearly being singled out. They're making a statement by not putting any of these male identity markers in the grave," Bettina Arnold, a professor of anthropology at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, told ABCNews.com. "But what made this individual different? Was it their sexual orientation? That's a little tricky."
Some initial media reports suggested that the remains belonged to a "caveman." But by the Copper Age, 5000 years ago, Europeans weren't cavedwellers at all, said Arnold. They were "sedentary agriculturalists" -- farmers.
Homosexuality, as Westerners think of it today, comes with a lot of added societal baggage that wouldn't resonate at all with prehistoric man, Arnold said. She pointed to examples of "gender transformers" across most ancient societies. Some Native American tribes, for example, have room for as many as seven different genders.
Men in many cultures throughout history have occupied a sort of liminal space between the two sexes: They would dress and act like women, but that behavior would have no bearing on their sexual orientation or who they slept with. These "third-gender" people, said Arnold, were sometimes even accorded special spiritual or shaman status in their societies.
Homosexuality Is as Old as Mankind
"This is not an uncommon phenomenon in prehistoric cemetery populations," said Arnold. "It's always there, but in small percentages."
Indeed, some draw comfort in the immutability this seems to suggest about human -- or even just plain animal -- nature.
"Homosexuality is found in a great many other species -- from ducks to chimps -- as well as many cultures where people are allowed to express it. In some societies, it is even celebrated, such as the Navajo where lesbians are believed to have a special connection to the spiritual world," Helen Fisher, a biological anthropologist at Rutgers University, wrote in an email to ABCNews.com.
"So," Fisher continued, "there is every reason to think that some of our ancestors were gay."
Archaeologists in the Czech Republic have unearthed the grave of what may be the remains of the oldest known homosexual or transgender man.
The prehistoric body dates to the Copper age -- or 2900 to 2500 years ago -- and was buried in a manner that was typically reserved for women.
The male skeleton was found on its side, facing east, and was surrounded by domestic jugs, objects previously seen only in female graves. An oval, egg-shaped container, usually associated with female burials, was also found at the feet of the skeleton.
"From history and ethnology, we know that people from this period took funeral rites very seriously, so it is highly unlikely that this positioning was a mistake," lead archaeologist Kamila Remisova Vesinova told the U.K.'s Telegraph.
Men of the period were buried with weapons -- stone battle axes and flint knives -- none of which were found in the Czech grave.
Vesinova concluded that the grave represents "one of the earliest cases of what could be described as a 'transsexual' or 'third gender grave' in the Czech Republic."
Not everyone is so convinced. Archaeologists in the Czech Republic have unearthed the grave of what may be the remains of the oldest known homosexual or transgendered man.
"He's clearly being singled out. They're making a statement by not putting any of these male identity markers in the grave," Bettina Arnold, a professor of anthropology at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, told ABCNews.com. "But what made this individual different? Was it their sexual orientation? That's a little tricky."
Some initial media reports suggested that the remains belonged to a "caveman." But by the Copper Age, 5000 years ago, Europeans weren't cavedwellers at all, said Arnold. They were "sedentary agriculturalists" -- farmers.
Homosexuality, as Westerners think of it today, comes with a lot of added societal baggage that wouldn't resonate at all with prehistoric man, Arnold said. She pointed to examples of "gender transformers" across most ancient societies. Some Native American tribes, for example, have room for as many as seven different genders.
Men in many cultures throughout history have occupied a sort of liminal space between the two sexes: They would dress and act like women, but that behavior would have no bearing on their sexual orientation or who they slept with. These "third-gender" people, said Arnold, were sometimes even accorded special spiritual or shaman status in their societies.
Homosexuality Is as Old as Mankind
"This is not an uncommon phenomenon in prehistoric cemetery populations," said Arnold. "It's always there, but in small percentages."
Indeed, some draw comfort in the immutability this seems to suggest about human -- or even just plain animal -- nature.
"Homosexuality is found in a great many other species -- from ducks to chimps -- as well as many cultures where people are allowed to express it. In some societies, it is even celebrated, such as the Navajo where lesbians are believed to have a special connection to the spiritual world," Helen Fisher, a biological anthropologist at Rutgers University, wrote in an email to ABCNews.com.
"So," Fisher continued, "there is every reason to think that some of our ancestors were gay."
Tuesday, August 2, 2011
The Terms "Homosexual" and the "N-word"
Using the term homosexual to describe a lesiban or gay individual is offensive and is like using the "n-word" to describe African-Americans. The negative connotation of the word homosexual came initially from both religions who are against homosexuality and also from early psychoanalysis. Before the 1970's it was widely believed that one could change from gay to straight. While there is a minority of groups and individuals who still believe this today, they are just that--a minority.
In fact, those who are anti-gay and believe that homosexuality is always a sign of pathology never use the word "gay". They always use the term homosexual because they say there is "nothing gay about being a homosexual" and that it is a choice-which today we know is not true. To read more about choice versus non-choice I suggust you read Jesse Bering's excellent blog.
Homosexual orientation is okay to say but to say homosexual community or "He is homosexual" is offensive. If you read an article or listen to something in the media where the word homosexual is used you are most likely reading something anti-gay or homo-ignorant-meaning that the author, journalist, speaker or reporter does not understand the negative connotations of the word.
Although the term homosexuality is still used, describing gays and lesbians as "homosexuals" is as offensive today as the words Negro, colored, or crippled. The correct words are gays and lesbians or GLBT (gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender) community.
Terms like sexual preference and alternative lifestyle are no longer considered appropriate. Preference implies that sexuality is a choice-which it's not-and for gays and lesbians, heterosexuality is the "alternative" lifestyle. The correct term is sexual and romantic orientation.
The gay male and lesbian communities use different terminologies and jargon in each community. Of course, some overlap exists between gays and lesbians, but each group has its own unique slang, "code" words, and euphemisms, and in cases of overlap, the terms may have different connotations for each community.
Over the years, other minority groups have changed how they want to be referred to in an attempt to change how they're treated. For example, African-Americans went from being called "Negro" and "colored" to "black" and "people of color" and finally to the current politically correct term African-American. Today, the word queer, once a pejorative term, is often used in a positive way. Dozens of books and articles are published with queer in their titles, and the term has come into common, affirmative usage by lesbians and gays as well.
It is always best to ask how you're a person with same-sex orientation self-identifies and use the same terms he or she uses, even if you feel uncomfortable with them on a personal level. For example, I don't personally like to use the term homosexual. But when my clients identify themselves as "homosexual" and dislike the terms gay or lesbian, then that's the word I use. To me, the word gay is affirmative and refers to a life of being out and open about one's sexual/romantic orientation. However, many people in the beginning stages of coming out feel uncomfortable with the term. Similarly, some lesbians prefer to be called "gay" rather than "lesbian," whereas others find the term offensive when used to describe women.
It is also important to understand that some "reclaimed" terms used by gays and lesbians to refer to themselves are considered offensive when used by straight people. For example, some lesbians call themselves "dykes" and some gay men call themselves "fags," but these same lesbians and gay men would take offense if a straight person called them that. (In fact, there is some disagreement in the gay and lesbian community itself about these terms, with some gays and lesbians finding them offensive regardless of whether it's another gay person using them.) In these cases, straight individuals should not use the same terminology the client uses, just as a Caucasian person should never use the "n-word" to refer to African-Americans, even if some African-Americans use the word themselves.
If you are unsure about whether your using a term might be considered offensive, it is best to not use it until you have established a rapport and can ask the lesbian or gay person how he or she feels about your using it.
Wicked humor
These four gents go out to play golf one day. One is detained in the clubhouse and the remaining three are discussing their children while walking to the first tee
"My son," says one, "has made quite a name for himself in the homebuilding industry. He began as a carpenter,but now owns his own design and construction firm. He's so successful that in his last year he was able to give a good friend a brand new home as a gift."
The second man not to be outdone, told how his daughter began her career as a car salesperson,but now owns a multi-line dealership. "She's so successful, in fact, in the last six months she gave a friend two brand new cars as a gift."
The third man's son has worked his way up through a stock brokerage firm and in the last few weeks has given a good friend a large stock portfolio as a gift.
As the fourth man arrives, they tell him that they have been discussing their children and ask him about his son.
"To tell the truth,I'm not very pleased with how my son has turned out," he replies. "For fifteen years, he's been in and out of work and I've just recently discovered he's a bisexual. But, on the bright side, he must be good at what he does because his last three lovers have given him a brand new house, two cars, and a big pile of stock certificates."
Monday, August 1, 2011
HETEROSEXUAL QUESTIONNAIRE
This questionnaire is for self-avowed heterosexuals only. If you are not openly heterosexual, pass it on to a friend who is. Please try to answer the questions as candidly as possible. Your responses will be held in strict confidence and your anonymity fully protected.
1. What do you think caused your heterosexuality?
2. When and how did you first decide you were a heterosexual?
3. Is it possible your heterosexuality is just a phase you may grow out of?
4. Could it be that your heterosexuality stems from a neurotic fear of others of the same sex?
5. If you’ve never slept with a person of the same sex, how can you be sure you wouldn’t prefer that?
6. To whom have you disclosed your heterosexual tendencies? How did they react?
7. Why do heterosexuals feel compelled to seduce others into their lifestyle?
8. Why do you insist on flaunting your heterosexuality? Can’t you just be what you are and keep it quiet?
9. Would you want your children to be heterosexual, knowing the problems they’d face?
10. A disproportionate majority of child molesters are heterosexual men. Do you consider it safe to expose children to heterosexual male teachers, pediatricians, priests, or scoutmasters?
11. With all the societal support for marriage, the divorce rate is spiraling. Why are there so few stable relationships among heterosexuals?
12. Why do heterosexuals place so much emphasis on sex?
13. Considering the menace of overpopulation, how could the human race survive if everyone were heterosexual?
14. Could you trust a heterosexual therapist to be objective? Don’t you fear s/he might be inclined to influence you in the direction of her/his own leanings?
15. Heterosexuals are notorious for assigning themselves and one another rigid, stereotyped sex roles. Why must you cling to such unhealthy role-playing?
16. With the sexually segregated living conditions of military life, isn’t heterosexuality incompatible with military service?
17. How can you enjoy an emotionally fulfilling experience with a person of the other sex when there are such vast differences between you? How can a man know what pleases a woman sexually or vice-versa?
18. Shouldn’t you ask your far-out straight cohorts, like skinheads and born-agains, to keep quiet? Wouldn’t that improve your image?
19. Why are heterosexuals so promiscuous?
20. Why do you attribute heterosexuality to so many famous lesbian and gay people? Is it to justify your own heterosexuality?
21. How can you hope to actualize your God-given homosexual potential if you limit yourself to exclusive, compulsive heterosexuality?
22. There seem to be very few happy heterosexuals. Techniques have been developed that might enable you to change if you really want to. After all, you never deliberately chose to be a heterosexual, did you? Have you considered aversion therapy or Heterosexuals Anonymous?
US courts can take a lesson here
Colombia court demands marriage equivalent for same-sex couples by 2013
Share
By Blair Mishleau
Gay Colombians have two years to wait for gay marriage or another similar type of union, after their Constitutional Court ruled that marriage equality should exist.
The court decided on July 26 to give the legislature until June 20, 2013 to create an equivalent to same-sex couples who want to get married. If no decision is made by then, gay couples can go to any notary public or judge to formalize their union, reports the Constitutional Court of Colombia in a release written in Spanish.
The case challenged Article 113 of the Civil Code, defining marriage between a man and a woman. It was brought to the court by Colombia Diversa, the legal aid group DeJusticia and others. It doesn’t appear to guarantee actual marriage for gays and lesbians, but does promise the rights associated with marriage, even if by another name.
Colombian Congress has defeated gay marriage proposals six times, according to Colombia Reports. In congress, the issue remains divisive.
“The constitution is clear in arguing that marriage is between a man and a woman, not same-sex,” Juan Manuel Corzo, the conservative chairman of the Senate said.
“The church is the church, but political decisions and rights are issues that we in politics have an obligation to address,” Rafael Prado, the director of the Liberal Party, said. “We defend those rights and it is clear that same-sex couples should have equal (rights).”
Colombia currently recognizes the equivalent to civil unions, including social health insurance and pension rights.
Share
By Blair Mishleau
Gay Colombians have two years to wait for gay marriage or another similar type of union, after their Constitutional Court ruled that marriage equality should exist.
The court decided on July 26 to give the legislature until June 20, 2013 to create an equivalent to same-sex couples who want to get married. If no decision is made by then, gay couples can go to any notary public or judge to formalize their union, reports the Constitutional Court of Colombia in a release written in Spanish.
The case challenged Article 113 of the Civil Code, defining marriage between a man and a woman. It was brought to the court by Colombia Diversa, the legal aid group DeJusticia and others. It doesn’t appear to guarantee actual marriage for gays and lesbians, but does promise the rights associated with marriage, even if by another name.
Colombian Congress has defeated gay marriage proposals six times, according to Colombia Reports. In congress, the issue remains divisive.
“The constitution is clear in arguing that marriage is between a man and a woman, not same-sex,” Juan Manuel Corzo, the conservative chairman of the Senate said.
“The church is the church, but political decisions and rights are issues that we in politics have an obligation to address,” Rafael Prado, the director of the Liberal Party, said. “We defend those rights and it is clear that same-sex couples should have equal (rights).”
Colombia currently recognizes the equivalent to civil unions, including social health insurance and pension rights.
Sunday, July 31, 2011
Let it all hang out
A recent study that sets to establish an association between penis size and sexual health among gay men has found some interesting results. The study reported, among its findings, that gay men with "below average penises" were more likely to assume a "bottom" sexual position, while those with "above average penises" were more likely to assume a "top" sexual position. Those with average penises identified themselves as "versatile" in the bedroom.
Furthermore the study reinforced long held beliefs such as the bigger the penis, the less likely to lie about it, smaller guys wish they were bigger, but no one wishes they were smaller.
It also found that those who believed that their penis was “below average” scored significantly worse than others on three measures of psychosocial adjustment. Also, men with above average penises were significantly more likely than men with average size penises to report having ever been infected with gonorrhea/Chlamydia/urinary tract infection. Could this suggest that guys with larger penises get more action? Or take more risks?
Why there can be no compromise
Big Assets: What married same-sex couples don’t get in federal benefits
Steve Doster, CFP® - Certified Financial Planner™ professional
With Pride season in full swing and the recent victory for same-sex marriage in New York, it’s a good time to remember that legally married gay and lesbian couples still do not get over 1,100 federal benefits and protections that opposite-sex married couples receive.
This number gets published quite a bit, but rarely do we hear specifically what these 1,100 federal benefits are. I thought it would be a good idea to outline just two benefits that opposite-sex couples receive that same-sex spouses do not get.
One of the most important benefits denied to married same-sex couples deals with Social Security. For opposite-sex spouses, one spouse can receive 50% of their spouse’s Social Security check.
Let’s say a husband gets $2,000 per month in Social Security. His wife was a homemaker and she would only get $200 per month based on her short career prior to getting married. However, she will receive $1,000 per month in Social Security because she gets 50% of her husband’s benefit.
If the husband dies before the wife, then the wife will start receiving her husband’s $2,000 monthly Social Security check instead of her $1,000 benefit.
For same-sex spouse’s, they don’t receive 50% of their spouse’s Social Security benefit. If one partner stops working to take care of the kids, elderly parents and/or home, then that spouse will get a very small Social Security benefit based on their own short working history.
And when one spouse dies, the surviving spouse does not get to take over their higher-earning spouse’s Social Security benefit.
A second benefit same-sex spouses do not get deals with how retirement accounts of a deceased spouse are passed to the surviving spouse. The surviving spouse can rollover their deceased spouse’s retirement accounts into an inherited IRA, so long as they are listed as the primary beneficiary. However, they have to begin taking distributions the year after their partner dies creating taxable income.
The surviving spouse of an opposite-sex couple can rollover 401(k)’s and IRA’s of their deceased spouse into their own name. This allows the surviving spouse to avoid paying taxes until they have to begin taking Required Minimum Distributions at age 70½.
Those are just two of the 1,100 federal benefits married same-sex couples do not get. I could go on writing about things like filing separate federal tax returns, no unlimited marital estate tax exemption, taxation of partner health benefits, and lack of survivor benefits for federal and military pensions, but I think you get the point.
Gay and lesbian married couples can lose tens of thousands of dollars over a lifetime by being denied these federal benefits given to opposite-sex couples.
The one benefit we do get is the ability to fight for our equal rights by repealing the Defense of Marriage Act and legalizing gay marriage in California. So enjoy Pride and then let’s get back to work!
Steve Doster, CFP® - Certified Financial Planner™ professional
With Pride season in full swing and the recent victory for same-sex marriage in New York, it’s a good time to remember that legally married gay and lesbian couples still do not get over 1,100 federal benefits and protections that opposite-sex married couples receive.
This number gets published quite a bit, but rarely do we hear specifically what these 1,100 federal benefits are. I thought it would be a good idea to outline just two benefits that opposite-sex couples receive that same-sex spouses do not get.
One of the most important benefits denied to married same-sex couples deals with Social Security. For opposite-sex spouses, one spouse can receive 50% of their spouse’s Social Security check.
Let’s say a husband gets $2,000 per month in Social Security. His wife was a homemaker and she would only get $200 per month based on her short career prior to getting married. However, she will receive $1,000 per month in Social Security because she gets 50% of her husband’s benefit.
If the husband dies before the wife, then the wife will start receiving her husband’s $2,000 monthly Social Security check instead of her $1,000 benefit.
For same-sex spouse’s, they don’t receive 50% of their spouse’s Social Security benefit. If one partner stops working to take care of the kids, elderly parents and/or home, then that spouse will get a very small Social Security benefit based on their own short working history.
And when one spouse dies, the surviving spouse does not get to take over their higher-earning spouse’s Social Security benefit.
A second benefit same-sex spouses do not get deals with how retirement accounts of a deceased spouse are passed to the surviving spouse. The surviving spouse can rollover their deceased spouse’s retirement accounts into an inherited IRA, so long as they are listed as the primary beneficiary. However, they have to begin taking distributions the year after their partner dies creating taxable income.
The surviving spouse of an opposite-sex couple can rollover 401(k)’s and IRA’s of their deceased spouse into their own name. This allows the surviving spouse to avoid paying taxes until they have to begin taking Required Minimum Distributions at age 70½.
Those are just two of the 1,100 federal benefits married same-sex couples do not get. I could go on writing about things like filing separate federal tax returns, no unlimited marital estate tax exemption, taxation of partner health benefits, and lack of survivor benefits for federal and military pensions, but I think you get the point.
Gay and lesbian married couples can lose tens of thousands of dollars over a lifetime by being denied these federal benefits given to opposite-sex couples.
The one benefit we do get is the ability to fight for our equal rights by repealing the Defense of Marriage Act and legalizing gay marriage in California. So enjoy Pride and then let’s get back to work!
Hot sport pics
Hockey hotties
Tight end
Bat and balls
Ooops
Juiced
I'da got a boner too.
Knock out
God bless this boner
Tight end
Bat and balls
Ooops
Juiced
I'da got a boner too.
Knock out
God bless this boner
Saturday, July 30, 2011
Stupid people rule the world
Perry snared by gay marriage issue
By Jennifer Rubin
Earlier this week I reported on the provocative move by Texas Gov. Rick Perry to apply his fondness for the 10th Amendment to gay marriage. He said last week: “Our friends in New York six weeks ago passed a statute that said marriage can be between two people of the same sex. And you know what? That’s New York, and that’s their business, and that’s fine with me. That is their call. If you believe in the 10th Amendment, stay out of their business.”
But now, as First Read reports, he’s backtracking, sort of:
In an interview with socially conservative Family Research Council President Tony Perkins, Perry said he remains opposed to gay marriage and that he should have added “a few words” to clarify the statement.
“I probably needed to add a few words after that ‘it’s fine with me,’ and that it’s fine with me that a state is using their sovereign rights to decide an issue,” Perry said according to FRC. “Obviously gay marriage is not fine with me. My stance hasn’t changed.”
But is this really a “backtrack”? After all, his conclusion (allow states to choose) is still the same. This is unlikely to please either Christian conservatives or libertarian, pro-gay-rights voters. And it smacks of the sort of waffling that got Mitt Romney into trouble in 2008. Frankly, Perry has so locked himself into a staunch 10th Amendment position that he’s going to face a lot more questions on everything from gay rights to the EPA (does he want to disband it). In an interview with me earlier in the year, he made clear that he opposes federal tort reform since it impinges on the civil courts of states. How is that going to go over with business leaders and with conservative health-care reformers who want the federal government to step in to tamp down on abusive litigation?
An adviser on another Republican campaign wisecracked to me: “So, the governor was ‘fine with’ gay marriage before he was ‘not fine’ with it. As Perry thinks about tossing his cowboy hat in the ring, everyone will see that this is just one in a Texas-sized string of flip-flops.” You can see the attack ads now.
This episode also bespeaks of a more fundamental problem for the Perry pre-campaign. His words are now highly scrutinized, but he lacks the infrastructure (a policy director, for example) to prevent these sorts of nettlesome problems.
Certainly, the country’s longest sitting governor is no stranger to the media. But state media, no matter how aggressive, simply doesn’t compare to the barrage of questioning and intense scrutiny that goes with the presidency. If Perry is going to avoid the Fred Thompson phenomenon (good on paper, but lousy in a presidential contest) he will need to get up to speed fast, figure out how he is going to navigate through many of these issues and bring in a team that is as familiar with presidential politics as it is with him.
By Jennifer Rubin
Earlier this week I reported on the provocative move by Texas Gov. Rick Perry to apply his fondness for the 10th Amendment to gay marriage. He said last week: “Our friends in New York six weeks ago passed a statute that said marriage can be between two people of the same sex. And you know what? That’s New York, and that’s their business, and that’s fine with me. That is their call. If you believe in the 10th Amendment, stay out of their business.”
But now, as First Read reports, he’s backtracking, sort of:
In an interview with socially conservative Family Research Council President Tony Perkins, Perry said he remains opposed to gay marriage and that he should have added “a few words” to clarify the statement.
“I probably needed to add a few words after that ‘it’s fine with me,’ and that it’s fine with me that a state is using their sovereign rights to decide an issue,” Perry said according to FRC. “Obviously gay marriage is not fine with me. My stance hasn’t changed.”
But is this really a “backtrack”? After all, his conclusion (allow states to choose) is still the same. This is unlikely to please either Christian conservatives or libertarian, pro-gay-rights voters. And it smacks of the sort of waffling that got Mitt Romney into trouble in 2008. Frankly, Perry has so locked himself into a staunch 10th Amendment position that he’s going to face a lot more questions on everything from gay rights to the EPA (does he want to disband it). In an interview with me earlier in the year, he made clear that he opposes federal tort reform since it impinges on the civil courts of states. How is that going to go over with business leaders and with conservative health-care reformers who want the federal government to step in to tamp down on abusive litigation?
An adviser on another Republican campaign wisecracked to me: “So, the governor was ‘fine with’ gay marriage before he was ‘not fine’ with it. As Perry thinks about tossing his cowboy hat in the ring, everyone will see that this is just one in a Texas-sized string of flip-flops.” You can see the attack ads now.
This episode also bespeaks of a more fundamental problem for the Perry pre-campaign. His words are now highly scrutinized, but he lacks the infrastructure (a policy director, for example) to prevent these sorts of nettlesome problems.
Certainly, the country’s longest sitting governor is no stranger to the media. But state media, no matter how aggressive, simply doesn’t compare to the barrage of questioning and intense scrutiny that goes with the presidency. If Perry is going to avoid the Fred Thompson phenomenon (good on paper, but lousy in a presidential contest) he will need to get up to speed fast, figure out how he is going to navigate through many of these issues and bring in a team that is as familiar with presidential politics as it is with him.
Mark Bingham: "A true hero who just happened to be gay"
Outfest 2011: Don’t miss the outstanding “With You” which recounts life of gay 9/11 hero Mark Bingham.
Here's an excerpt from the documentary about this amazing man:
Friday, July 29, 2011
Must be Friday because Ulf is horny
Yup,it's Nick Youngquest
He goes against the grain of what we've come to think of str8 athletes and has openly, defiantly supported gay rights; even lending his ever so hot body for nude photos in gay mags.
I won't go into my usual sleazy rant of what I'd want to do with him, at this point I think with him it's pretty much the given that I would do anything he wants.
Ulf
Well, I ain't registering at Cabela's just yet...
Gay marriage gets record support, 70 percent of young people support it
By Blair Mishleau,
A new bi-partisan study confirms that first time, support for gay marriage generally outweighs opposition, and the rate of increase is startling.
According to the study, the rate of increase in support for gay marriage accelerated to 5 percent per year in 2010 and 2011. Between 1996 and 2009, this rate was less than 1 percent.
Freedom to Marry, a pro-gay marriage organization, compiled poll data from Gallup, CNN/ORC, ABC/Washington Post, and Pew Research Center and others.
The Gallup poll’s 2011 data supports marriage at 53 percent, compared to just 27 percent in 1996. Pew’s data, the lowest in support at 45 percent, was also at 27 percent in 1997.
“A secondary analysis of public polling on marriage shows support has increased over the years and that the rate of increase has accelerated dramatically in the last two years,” reads the report.
Also notable is the age demographic breakup – 68 percent of 18-29 year-olds support gay marriage, (up 11 points since 2005). Older adults, while still generally opposing marriage equality, have grown closer to support. Only 33 percent of adults 65 and older are in support, but this is up from a mere 18 percent in 2005.
The authors of the findings are Republican Dr. Jan van Lohuizen of Voter Consumer Research, who worked for President George W. Bush’s presidential campaigns and Democrat Joel Benenson, who was the lead pollster and a senior strategist for President Barack Obama in the 2008 election.
“Even where antigay ballot measures succeed at the time, the net result is that people are prompted into these conversations,” Evan Wolfson, president of Freedom to Marry, said to U.S. News. “The more people talk about this, the more they move into support of the freedom to marry.”
By Blair Mishleau,
A new bi-partisan study confirms that first time, support for gay marriage generally outweighs opposition, and the rate of increase is startling.
According to the study, the rate of increase in support for gay marriage accelerated to 5 percent per year in 2010 and 2011. Between 1996 and 2009, this rate was less than 1 percent.
Freedom to Marry, a pro-gay marriage organization, compiled poll data from Gallup, CNN/ORC, ABC/Washington Post, and Pew Research Center and others.
The Gallup poll’s 2011 data supports marriage at 53 percent, compared to just 27 percent in 1996. Pew’s data, the lowest in support at 45 percent, was also at 27 percent in 1997.
“A secondary analysis of public polling on marriage shows support has increased over the years and that the rate of increase has accelerated dramatically in the last two years,” reads the report.
Also notable is the age demographic breakup – 68 percent of 18-29 year-olds support gay marriage, (up 11 points since 2005). Older adults, while still generally opposing marriage equality, have grown closer to support. Only 33 percent of adults 65 and older are in support, but this is up from a mere 18 percent in 2005.
The authors of the findings are Republican Dr. Jan van Lohuizen of Voter Consumer Research, who worked for President George W. Bush’s presidential campaigns and Democrat Joel Benenson, who was the lead pollster and a senior strategist for President Barack Obama in the 2008 election.
“Even where antigay ballot measures succeed at the time, the net result is that people are prompted into these conversations,” Evan Wolfson, president of Freedom to Marry, said to U.S. News. “The more people talk about this, the more they move into support of the freedom to marry.”
Two UK lads demonstrate exactly how to have great sex
I love everything about this vid, from beginning to end. From the flirtation, the chase, the catch and finally, the hot nonstop, flip flopping, nasty trash talkin'
can't get enough of you man on man sex, followed by some of the most perfect after sex banter between two guys that just really got into each other.
Enjoy folks, it don't get much better than this.
Ulf
Let's start today with a vid
It's Friday and I've taken the day off from work, what sux tho, JD is of course working and I'm friggin' horny.
I liked this vid because of the ending, everything else is pretty ho hum, probably because I'm pretty sure both tops in the vid are G4P but the bottom boi saves the scene by swallowing both guy's loads...the mark of a true professional performer.
(Okay, I might just be fantasizing that part just a little)
Ulf
Thursday, July 28, 2011
A lie told often enough...
Sen. Al Franken catches anti-gay witness misrepresenting study at hearing
Robert Steinback – Hatewatch blog at Southern Poverty Law Center
July 21st, 2011
Sen. Al Franken catches anti-gay witness misrepresenting study at hearing
A representative of one of the nation’s largest organizations opposed to same-sex marriage learned, as the U.S. Senate and the entire nation watched, to be careful what studies you cite – because someone might actually read them.
U.S. Sen. Al Franken of Minnesota caught Thomas Minnery, vice president of government and public policy for Focus on the Family, blatantly mischaracterizing a government study on the benefits to children of being raised by two married parents as referring to opposite-sex parents, when the report itself drew no such distinction. It was the latest in a relentless campaign of misrepresentations, half-truths and outright lies in recent years that have defined anti-gay Christian right organizations intent on opposing equal rights and common dignity for LGBT people.
Testifying today at a Senate hearing on a bill that would repeal the federal Defense of Marriage Act, Franken said, “Mr. Minnery, on page eight of your written testimony, you write, quote, ‘Children living … with their own married biological or adoptive mothers and fathers were generally healthier and happier, had better access to health care, less likely to suffer mild or severe emotional problems, did better in school, were protected from physical, emotional and sexual abuse, and almost never live in poverty compared with children in any other family form.’ You cite a Department of Health and Human Services study that I have right here from December 2010 to support this conclusion.
“I checked the study out,” Franken said, pausing to let a ripple of laughter from the gallery dissipate, “and I would like to enter into the record, if I may, that it actually doesn’t say what you said it says. It says, ‘nuclear families,’ not opposite-sex married families, are associated with those positive outcomes. Isn’t it true, Mr. Minnery, that a married same-sex couple that has had or adopted kids would fall under the definition of a nuclear family in the study that you cite?
Minnery replied, “I would think that the study when it cites nuclear families would mean a family headed by a husband and wife.”
“It doesn’t,” Franken said, again spurring laughter from onlookers. But as with the earlier audience reaction, Franken, a former comedian, remained deadpan serious. “The study defines a nuclear family as one or more children living with two parents who are married to one another and are each biological or adoptive parents to all the children in the family. And I frankly don’t really know how we can trust the rest of your testimony if you are reading studies these ways.”
Earlier, Franken had said, “The Defense of Marriage Act is an injustice. It is an immoral and discriminatory law. … Repealing DOMA will be a great day in this country, akin to the enacting of the 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution,” which guaranteed women the right to vote.
It is ironic that Focus on the Family’s representative was the one taken to task today. The organization, once the nation’s unchallenged powerhouse in anti-gay activism, has taken a decidedly more moderate, or at least more pragmatic, stance regarding same-sex marriage since current president Jim Daly took over for founding president James C. Dobson in 2005. Although remaining ideologically opposed to same-sex marriage, Daly has suggested that trying to stop it is a losing proposition for “pro-family” groups due to strong support from young people and pervasive problems confronting heterosexual marriages. Asked in May about same-sex marriage, Daly said, “We’re losing on that one, especially among the 20- and 30-somethings: 65 to 70 percent of them favor same-sex marriage. I don’t know if that’s going to change with a little more age – demographers would say probably not. We’ve probably lost that. I don’t want to be extremist here, but I think we need to start calculating where we are in the culture.”
Robert Steinback – Hatewatch blog at Southern Poverty Law Center
July 21st, 2011
Sen. Al Franken catches anti-gay witness misrepresenting study at hearing
A representative of one of the nation’s largest organizations opposed to same-sex marriage learned, as the U.S. Senate and the entire nation watched, to be careful what studies you cite – because someone might actually read them.
U.S. Sen. Al Franken of Minnesota caught Thomas Minnery, vice president of government and public policy for Focus on the Family, blatantly mischaracterizing a government study on the benefits to children of being raised by two married parents as referring to opposite-sex parents, when the report itself drew no such distinction. It was the latest in a relentless campaign of misrepresentations, half-truths and outright lies in recent years that have defined anti-gay Christian right organizations intent on opposing equal rights and common dignity for LGBT people.
Testifying today at a Senate hearing on a bill that would repeal the federal Defense of Marriage Act, Franken said, “Mr. Minnery, on page eight of your written testimony, you write, quote, ‘Children living … with their own married biological or adoptive mothers and fathers were generally healthier and happier, had better access to health care, less likely to suffer mild or severe emotional problems, did better in school, were protected from physical, emotional and sexual abuse, and almost never live in poverty compared with children in any other family form.’ You cite a Department of Health and Human Services study that I have right here from December 2010 to support this conclusion.
“I checked the study out,” Franken said, pausing to let a ripple of laughter from the gallery dissipate, “and I would like to enter into the record, if I may, that it actually doesn’t say what you said it says. It says, ‘nuclear families,’ not opposite-sex married families, are associated with those positive outcomes. Isn’t it true, Mr. Minnery, that a married same-sex couple that has had or adopted kids would fall under the definition of a nuclear family in the study that you cite?
Minnery replied, “I would think that the study when it cites nuclear families would mean a family headed by a husband and wife.”
“It doesn’t,” Franken said, again spurring laughter from onlookers. But as with the earlier audience reaction, Franken, a former comedian, remained deadpan serious. “The study defines a nuclear family as one or more children living with two parents who are married to one another and are each biological or adoptive parents to all the children in the family. And I frankly don’t really know how we can trust the rest of your testimony if you are reading studies these ways.”
Earlier, Franken had said, “The Defense of Marriage Act is an injustice. It is an immoral and discriminatory law. … Repealing DOMA will be a great day in this country, akin to the enacting of the 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution,” which guaranteed women the right to vote.
It is ironic that Focus on the Family’s representative was the one taken to task today. The organization, once the nation’s unchallenged powerhouse in anti-gay activism, has taken a decidedly more moderate, or at least more pragmatic, stance regarding same-sex marriage since current president Jim Daly took over for founding president James C. Dobson in 2005. Although remaining ideologically opposed to same-sex marriage, Daly has suggested that trying to stop it is a losing proposition for “pro-family” groups due to strong support from young people and pervasive problems confronting heterosexual marriages. Asked in May about same-sex marriage, Daly said, “We’re losing on that one, especially among the 20- and 30-somethings: 65 to 70 percent of them favor same-sex marriage. I don’t know if that’s going to change with a little more age – demographers would say probably not. We’ve probably lost that. I don’t want to be extremist here, but I think we need to start calculating where we are in the culture.”
Wednesday, July 27, 2011
Just two guys really enjoying each other
I'll take a simple scene like this, of two men having a real connection over any production company bullshit like ya get with Raging Stallion, Corbin Fisher, Sean Cody or Channel 1 Releasing (Chi Chi LaLoser)
I'm getting so I hate fake porn, especially ones pushing str8 bait over real gay sex.
Don't get me wrong, I love seeing str8 guys paired up with a good cocksucker and ya get to see him "stretch his boundaries" but the turn on is *knowing* that's what it is. I hate having str8 bois presented as the next big gay porn star when they aren't even gay i.e: Ricky Sinz, Reese Rideout, Logan McCree etc.
Ulf (preachy and bitchie today)
Tuesday, July 26, 2011
Monday, July 25, 2011
SIZE QUEEN
I'm not normally into hairless twinkie types, but I like this boi or more specifically, I like his huge gaping boi pussy.
I would just love to lick, suck and slaver all over that hole, hell, if it were possible,I'd love to shove my whole head up that twat and lick him inside out.
Ulf (Oh great, now I'm horny again)
DOD officials: Benefits for gay troops will be examined
DOD officials: Benefits for gay troops will be examined
July 22, 2011
By Chris Johnson on July 22, 2011
Marine Maj. Gen. Steven Hummer and Virginia "Vee" Penrod, co-chairs of the Repeal Implementation Team.
Possible benefits that could be afforded to service members with same-sex partners will be the “the largest piece” of what the Pentagon intends to examine in the 60 days before “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” is off the books, according to DOD officials.
Marine Corps Maj. Gen. Steven Hummer, chief of staff of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Repeal Implementation Team, identified benefits Friday as among the policies “important to the department and service members” and said they’ll be examined before and after the military’s gay ban has been lifted.
“The department will continue to study existing benefits to determine those, if any, that should be reviewed based on policy, fiscal, legal and feasibility considerations, to give the service member the discretion to designate persons of their own choosing as beneficiaries,” Hummer said.
Hummer made the remarks during a news conference at the Pentagon intended to answer questions about the path forward for the military now that “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal has been certified. The president, the defense secretary and the chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff certified repeal Friday in accordance with the repeal law, which means the military’s gay ban will be off the books on Sept. 20.
Even with “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” off the books, gay service members with partners or spouses faced inequities thanks to straight service members in marriages on issues such as living expenses and medical care, travel, housing benefits. Much of this inequity is because of the Defense of Marriage Act, which prohibits federal recognition of same-sex marriage.
Asked by the Washington Blade whether the Repeal Implementation Team identified any partner benefits that could go to gay service members despite DOMA, Virginia “Vee” Penrod, deputy assistant secretary of defense for military personnel policy and co-chair of the Repeal Implementation Team, said the group determined to hold off on those determinations until after repeal takes effect.
“When we looked at the plan for implementation of the law, our priority was to develop the training and ensure that the force is trained,” Penrod said. “And looking at that priority, we realized the benefits, although very important — that we would wait until repeal before we decided to look in the benefits; which we will do upon repeal.”
Pressed by the New York Times for an example of a benefit that may be afforded to service members despite DOMA, Penrod said legal counsel may be among them.
“We have, like, legal policy for — where an individual could come in and would request legal assistance,” Penrod said. “And whether or not is that just for the service member or can I bring in my partner and also have assistance, and so that’s an example. There are just some that are not by law, but it’s by policy.”
Another reporter continued to ask whether the difference in benefits for gay and straight service members “may cause friction” in the armed forces that could disrupt unit cohesion.
Hummer maintained the Pentagon “will continue to follow the law” as mandated by DOMA and leaders are responsible for maintaining good order and discipline “irrespective of sexual orientation.”
In addition to maintaing that an examination of benefits is in the works, Pentagon officials disputed the notion that an executive order would be necessary to provide non-discrimination protections for gay service members. While “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” is on its way to being lifted, no new statute has been put in its place to protect gay troops from discrimination.
Some advocates have been calling for an executive order from President Obama that would prohibit discrimination against service members on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. The Obama administration hasn’t explicitly said whether or not it would issue such a directive, but Pentagon officials have maintained the current military code within the chain of command is sufficient.
Asked whether an executive order would be needed to address discrimination, Hummer replied, “I believe it does not.”
“All service members, irrespective of their sexual orientation, are entitled to an environment that is free of any bars that would prohibit their full growth to as high a responsibility as they could reach,” Hummer said.
Hmm, well I guess I might have been wrong, but I think I'll wait and see before I say it's a done deal.
Ulf
July 22, 2011
By Chris Johnson on July 22, 2011
Marine Maj. Gen. Steven Hummer and Virginia "Vee" Penrod, co-chairs of the Repeal Implementation Team.
Possible benefits that could be afforded to service members with same-sex partners will be the “the largest piece” of what the Pentagon intends to examine in the 60 days before “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” is off the books, according to DOD officials.
Marine Corps Maj. Gen. Steven Hummer, chief of staff of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Repeal Implementation Team, identified benefits Friday as among the policies “important to the department and service members” and said they’ll be examined before and after the military’s gay ban has been lifted.
“The department will continue to study existing benefits to determine those, if any, that should be reviewed based on policy, fiscal, legal and feasibility considerations, to give the service member the discretion to designate persons of their own choosing as beneficiaries,” Hummer said.
Hummer made the remarks during a news conference at the Pentagon intended to answer questions about the path forward for the military now that “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal has been certified. The president, the defense secretary and the chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff certified repeal Friday in accordance with the repeal law, which means the military’s gay ban will be off the books on Sept. 20.
Even with “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” off the books, gay service members with partners or spouses faced inequities thanks to straight service members in marriages on issues such as living expenses and medical care, travel, housing benefits. Much of this inequity is because of the Defense of Marriage Act, which prohibits federal recognition of same-sex marriage.
Asked by the Washington Blade whether the Repeal Implementation Team identified any partner benefits that could go to gay service members despite DOMA, Virginia “Vee” Penrod, deputy assistant secretary of defense for military personnel policy and co-chair of the Repeal Implementation Team, said the group determined to hold off on those determinations until after repeal takes effect.
“When we looked at the plan for implementation of the law, our priority was to develop the training and ensure that the force is trained,” Penrod said. “And looking at that priority, we realized the benefits, although very important — that we would wait until repeal before we decided to look in the benefits; which we will do upon repeal.”
Pressed by the New York Times for an example of a benefit that may be afforded to service members despite DOMA, Penrod said legal counsel may be among them.
“We have, like, legal policy for — where an individual could come in and would request legal assistance,” Penrod said. “And whether or not is that just for the service member or can I bring in my partner and also have assistance, and so that’s an example. There are just some that are not by law, but it’s by policy.”
Another reporter continued to ask whether the difference in benefits for gay and straight service members “may cause friction” in the armed forces that could disrupt unit cohesion.
Hummer maintained the Pentagon “will continue to follow the law” as mandated by DOMA and leaders are responsible for maintaining good order and discipline “irrespective of sexual orientation.”
In addition to maintaing that an examination of benefits is in the works, Pentagon officials disputed the notion that an executive order would be necessary to provide non-discrimination protections for gay service members. While “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” is on its way to being lifted, no new statute has been put in its place to protect gay troops from discrimination.
Some advocates have been calling for an executive order from President Obama that would prohibit discrimination against service members on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. The Obama administration hasn’t explicitly said whether or not it would issue such a directive, but Pentagon officials have maintained the current military code within the chain of command is sufficient.
Asked whether an executive order would be needed to address discrimination, Hummer replied, “I believe it does not.”
“All service members, irrespective of their sexual orientation, are entitled to an environment that is free of any bars that would prohibit their full growth to as high a responsibility as they could reach,” Hummer said.
Hmm, well I guess I might have been wrong, but I think I'll wait and see before I say it's a done deal.
Ulf
USPS stamp to honor Harvey Milk?
From a news release
2011-07-23
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force has delivered more than 10,000 signatures from a Change.org petition supporting a Harvey Milk Stamp to the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee, which is holding its quarterly meeting this week in Washington, D.C.
"Harvey Milk was a lion of social justice. To see his likeness on a U.S. stamp would do this country proud," said Russell Roybal, deputy executive director of external relations at the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. "Harvey Milk's courage, commitment and perseverance continue to inspire and inform people all around the world who fight every day for equality and our common humanity."
He adds, "Thousands have made their voices heard by signing this petition. We ask the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee and United States Postal Service to listen and do the right thing by choosing a true trailblazer, Harvey Milk. The Task Force is proud to partner with the Harvey Milk Foundation and International Court Council in this important and historic endeavor."
Read more story below....
The Task Force launched its Change.org petition leading up to Harvey Milk's 80th birthday in May, in coordination with the Harvey Milk Foundation and International Court Council.
"As one of the first openly gay men elected to public office in the United States, and as the first in California, Milk inspired a generation of activists and continues to be a lasting symbol in the fight for full equality," the Task Force petition said. "As a 2009 recipient of the Medal of Freedom, America's highest civilian honor, Harvey Milk has already been nationally recognized as a pioneer in the fight for civil rights of gays and lesbians."
Roy Betts, manager of community relations for the United States Postal Service, told Change.org, "I am pleased to respond that Harvey Milk is under consideration by the committee for possible future stamp issuance. The committee is responsible for reviewing stamp proposals and making subject and design recommendations to the Postmaster General."
On behalf of the United States Postal Service's Postmaster General, the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee ( CSAC ) is tasked with evaluating the merits of all stamp proposals. A public announcement about a potential Harvey Milk stamp will not be made until the fall of 2013 at the earliest.
"The committee decides on new stamp subject recommendations far in advance of the issue date in order to provide time for planning, design, production and distribution. Currently, the 2012 and 2013 stamp programs are completed, and stamp subjects for the 2014 program and subsequent years are being selected," said Betts. "Although many of the subjects for upcoming new stamps have been identified, no public announcement of individual new stamps is made until the entire stamp program for that year has been approved. This occurs in the fall preceding the year of issuance."
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force's Harvey Milk Stamp Petition on Change.org:
http:// www.change.org/petitions/honor-harvey-milks-legacy-with-a-usps-stamp
Learn more about the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force:
http:// www.thetaskforce.org
Learn more about Harvey Milk:
http://milkfoundation.org
2011-07-23
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force has delivered more than 10,000 signatures from a Change.org petition supporting a Harvey Milk Stamp to the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee, which is holding its quarterly meeting this week in Washington, D.C.
"Harvey Milk was a lion of social justice. To see his likeness on a U.S. stamp would do this country proud," said Russell Roybal, deputy executive director of external relations at the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. "Harvey Milk's courage, commitment and perseverance continue to inspire and inform people all around the world who fight every day for equality and our common humanity."
He adds, "Thousands have made their voices heard by signing this petition. We ask the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee and United States Postal Service to listen and do the right thing by choosing a true trailblazer, Harvey Milk. The Task Force is proud to partner with the Harvey Milk Foundation and International Court Council in this important and historic endeavor."
Read more story below....
The Task Force launched its Change.org petition leading up to Harvey Milk's 80th birthday in May, in coordination with the Harvey Milk Foundation and International Court Council.
"As one of the first openly gay men elected to public office in the United States, and as the first in California, Milk inspired a generation of activists and continues to be a lasting symbol in the fight for full equality," the Task Force petition said. "As a 2009 recipient of the Medal of Freedom, America's highest civilian honor, Harvey Milk has already been nationally recognized as a pioneer in the fight for civil rights of gays and lesbians."
Roy Betts, manager of community relations for the United States Postal Service, told Change.org, "I am pleased to respond that Harvey Milk is under consideration by the committee for possible future stamp issuance. The committee is responsible for reviewing stamp proposals and making subject and design recommendations to the Postmaster General."
On behalf of the United States Postal Service's Postmaster General, the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee ( CSAC ) is tasked with evaluating the merits of all stamp proposals. A public announcement about a potential Harvey Milk stamp will not be made until the fall of 2013 at the earliest.
"The committee decides on new stamp subject recommendations far in advance of the issue date in order to provide time for planning, design, production and distribution. Currently, the 2012 and 2013 stamp programs are completed, and stamp subjects for the 2014 program and subsequent years are being selected," said Betts. "Although many of the subjects for upcoming new stamps have been identified, no public announcement of individual new stamps is made until the entire stamp program for that year has been approved. This occurs in the fall preceding the year of issuance."
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force's Harvey Milk Stamp Petition on Change.org:
http:// www.change.org/petitions/honor-harvey-milks-legacy-with-a-usps-stamp
Learn more about the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force:
http:// www.thetaskforce.org
Learn more about Harvey Milk:
http://milkfoundation.org
Sunday, July 24, 2011
Ulf can translate...
I want a commitment.
I'm sick of masturbation.
Haven't I seen you before?
Nice ass.
I need you.
My hand is tired.
You're the only man I've ever cared about.
You are the only man who hasn't rejected me.
I'm a Romantic.
I'm poor.
I really want to get to know you better.
So I can tell my friends about it.
It's just orange juice, try it.
3 more shots, and he'll have his legs around my head.
He's kinda cute.
I want to have sex with him till my dick turns blue!
He's not my type.
He won't sleep with me.
I miss you so much
I am so horny that my dog is starting to look good.
I had a wonderful time last night.
Who the hell are you?
Do you love me?
I've done something stupid and you might find out.
Do you 'really' love me?
I've done something stupid and you're going to find out.
I'll give you a call.
I'd rather have my nipples torn off by wild dogs than see you again.
I've been thinking a lot.
You're not as attractive as when I was drunk.
I think we should just be friends.
You're ugly.
I've learned a lot from you.
Next!!!!
BBC censors gay sex scene from Torchwood
ON TV / Uncensored version to air Saturday nights in Canada
Scott Dagostino / National / Thursday, July 21, 2011
From its inception in 2006 by Queer as Folk creator Russell T Davies, the TV series Torchwood has been billed as “sci-fi for adults.” For three seasons now, this blend of The X-Files and True Blood has cheerfully thrown sex, swearing, blood and bondage into its alien mix as openly gay actor John Barrowman stars as the immortal, bisexual WWII veteran Captain Jack Harkness, leading a team of paranormal investigators in the UK.
Ianto Jones, Jack Harkness and Gwen Cooper played by Gareth David-Lloyd, John Barrowman and Eve Myles.
In its new season, a creepy 10-part series dubbed “Miracle Day,” the show has moved to Los Angeles in a co-production deal with the US Starz network. Fans worried the new American partners would neuter Jack’s cheerful polymorphous promiscuity, but for episode three, airing later this week, it’s the BBC that has angered viewers by choosing to censor a sex scene between Barrowman and Canadian actor Dillon Casey.
As an irritated Barrowman told the Sun, “It’s not gratuitous sex...You go back into history with Jack and you discover an integral relationship that is part and parcel to what is happening. It’s a massive story.”
While seasons one and two of Torchwood included Barrowman making out with several male co-stars, the series ran on sub-channels BBC2 and BBC3. With the 2009 Children of Earth miniseries moving to the flagship BBC1, Torchwood got great ratings but increased scrutiny at a time when, like here at home with our CBC, the Conservative government is proposing cuts to the public broadcaster’s funding.
The BBC edits of Torchwood air in Canada on CTV’s Space network on Tuesday nights at 8pm but Renee Dupuis, communications manager at Space, assures that the Canadian network will also continue to run the uncensored Starz versions on Saturdays nights at 9:10pm, so those deprived of seeing Barrowman and Casey go at it this weekend can check it out Saturday.
Davies, meanwhile, has pitched a new series about gay men (enigmatically titled Cucumber) to the US cable channel Showtime, home to daring series like Weeds and Dexter. For a writer who likes to provoke, such censorship worries may soon be science-fiction.
Scott Dagostino / National / Thursday, July 21, 2011
From its inception in 2006 by Queer as Folk creator Russell T Davies, the TV series Torchwood has been billed as “sci-fi for adults.” For three seasons now, this blend of The X-Files and True Blood has cheerfully thrown sex, swearing, blood and bondage into its alien mix as openly gay actor John Barrowman stars as the immortal, bisexual WWII veteran Captain Jack Harkness, leading a team of paranormal investigators in the UK.
Ianto Jones, Jack Harkness and Gwen Cooper played by Gareth David-Lloyd, John Barrowman and Eve Myles.
In its new season, a creepy 10-part series dubbed “Miracle Day,” the show has moved to Los Angeles in a co-production deal with the US Starz network. Fans worried the new American partners would neuter Jack’s cheerful polymorphous promiscuity, but for episode three, airing later this week, it’s the BBC that has angered viewers by choosing to censor a sex scene between Barrowman and Canadian actor Dillon Casey.
As an irritated Barrowman told the Sun, “It’s not gratuitous sex...You go back into history with Jack and you discover an integral relationship that is part and parcel to what is happening. It’s a massive story.”
While seasons one and two of Torchwood included Barrowman making out with several male co-stars, the series ran on sub-channels BBC2 and BBC3. With the 2009 Children of Earth miniseries moving to the flagship BBC1, Torchwood got great ratings but increased scrutiny at a time when, like here at home with our CBC, the Conservative government is proposing cuts to the public broadcaster’s funding.
The BBC edits of Torchwood air in Canada on CTV’s Space network on Tuesday nights at 8pm but Renee Dupuis, communications manager at Space, assures that the Canadian network will also continue to run the uncensored Starz versions on Saturdays nights at 9:10pm, so those deprived of seeing Barrowman and Casey go at it this weekend can check it out Saturday.
Davies, meanwhile, has pitched a new series about gay men (enigmatically titled Cucumber) to the US cable channel Showtime, home to daring series like Weeds and Dexter. For a writer who likes to provoke, such censorship worries may soon be science-fiction.
Saturday, July 23, 2011
Captain America
JD and I went to see this movie last night, Chris Evans is so friggin' hot, I barely noticed whether there was a plot at all.
Ulf
Speaking of straight guy's...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







































