Kentucky Governor Steve Beshear has vetoed House Bill 279 , by which a "religious individual could claim an exemption from any law or policy that prohibits discrimination" according to the ACLU, "leaving racial minorities, women, LGBT people and others without adequate protections."
From the Governor's website:
“Religious freedom is a cornerstone of
this great nation, and a right enshrined in both the United States
Constitution and the Kentucky Constitution,” said Gov. Beshear. “I
value and cherish our rights to religious freedom and I appreciate the
good intentions of House Bill 279 and the members of the General
Assembly who supported this bill to protect our constitutional rights to
practice our religion. However, I have significant concerns that this
bill will cause serious unintentional consequences that could threaten
public safety, health care, and individuals’ civil rights. As written,
the bill will undoubtedly lead to costly litigation. I have heard from
many organizations and government entities that share those same
concerns. Therefore, after giving this measure thoughtful analysis and
consideration, today I vetoed the bill.”
HB279, sent to the Governor on March 11, would allow an individual to disregard any state or local law that places a substantial burden on his or her sincerely held religious belief. As written, the government would have to show by “clear and convincing evidence” that the state has a compelling interest in requiring the person to follow the established law, and that there is no less restrictive means to accomplish the government’s objective.
The ACLU earlier this month had expressed concern that the bill might
be used to undermine existing LGBT Fairness protections for individuals
covered by local statutes in Louisville, Lexington, Covington and
Vicco, Kentucky.HB279, sent to the Governor on March 11, would allow an individual to disregard any state or local law that places a substantial burden on his or her sincerely held religious belief. As written, the government would have to show by “clear and convincing evidence” that the state has a compelling interest in requiring the person to follow the established law, and that there is no less restrictive means to accomplish the government’s objective.
No comments:
Post a Comment