By Zack Ford :
Since Brendan Eich resigned as CEO of Mozilla because of his donation to the Proposition 8 campaign, many have continued to debate whether public figures should be held accountable for their anti-gay activism. A new effort under the banner of “Freedom to Marry, Freedom to Dissent,”
which seems to be driven by pro-LGBT conservatives, argues that
“disagreement should not be punished” because “disagreement is not,
itself, harm or hate.”
The public statement compares Eich to Frank Kameny, an early gay
rights activist who lost his job because of his sexual orientation,
suggesting that those who celebrate Eich’s departure are engaging in the
same kind of discrimination. “Like [Kameny],” the statement concludes,
“we place our confidence in persuasion, not punishment.”
This “Freedom to Dissent” pledge essentially justifies anti-gay
advocacy. Ilya Somin, writing for The Volokh Conspiracy at the
Washington Post, ironically illuminates this reality while explaining why he felt he couldn’t sign it:
I felt unable to sign the petition when asked, because there are some parts that might be construed as claiming that it is never
appropriate to fire people for their political views. For example, at
one point the statement asserts that “the consequence of holding a wrong
opinion should not be the loss of a job.” I think this is true in the
vast majority of cases, but not always. For example, few would
object if Eich had been fired for donating money to the KKK or a
neo-Nazi organization – even if he had otherwise performed his duties
well, and had never mistreated any of Mozilla’s black or Jewish
employees. Despite some deplorable PC excesses, overall the effort to stigmatize racism and Nazism has produced some beneficial results.
In other words, supporting racism and anti-Semitism would be
deplorable, but supporting laws that discriminate against the gay
community is forgivable. This double standard not only justifies homophobic thinking, but also placates the narrative put forth by opponents of equality that the LGBT movement consists of bullies.
For example, Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly claimed on his show this week that gay rights activists are threatening to “harm,” “hurt,” and “intimidate”
marriage equality opponents, though he couldn’t cite a specific example
of such tactics. The American Family Association sent a fundraising
email this week highlighting “7 common careers Christians may no longer hold in America,”
listing photographers, bakers, florists, journalists, counselors,
innkeepers, and teachers as examples of professionals that the LGBT
movement attempts to “ostracize and humiliate” for running their
businesses “according to the dictates of their faith and conscience” —
i.e., for blatantly discriminating against LGBT people. These tactics
claim that those who engage in discrimination are the victims, not the
actual victims of the discrimination.
Those supporting this “Freedom to Dissent” pledge are promising to
tolerate intolerance, which is exactly what opponents of LGBT equality
are demanding. It’s unclear how defending those who wish for LGBT people
to remain second-class citizens constitutes “the only truly secure path
to equal rights,” as the pledge claims.
I defy these self loathing homosexual apologist, to name one gay organization that put it's weight behind firing Brendan Eich, who, it turns out, also supported anti-gay politicians, something these trolls don't mention, because all the politicians are Republicans (like the homosexuals who signed this piece of anti-gay shit)