The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), an independent agency of
the United States government, voted today (14 December) to repeal net
neutrality.
Though it’s a move objected by a majority of Americans, regardless of party affiliation, the organization went through with it. Even Republicans startled to bristle at the idea by the end.
The Commissioner of the FCC, Ajit Pai, appointed by Donald Trump, first suggested repealing net neutrality rules.
This morning, the rest of the commission voted on it and it went
exactly as expected — along party lines. The three Republicans voted for
reclassification, two Democrats voted against.
Now the fight really begins.
Net neutrality, in essence, is what makes the internet an equal and utilitarian space.
Barack Obama’s administration adopted net neutrality regulations in
February 2015, essentially making internet companies utilities. They
became classified as Title II or ‘common carriers’.
All this meant is every internet provider couldn’t restrict access or
speed to website and apps, regardless of their source. In simpler
terms: an internet provider couldn’t make it slower or more difficult to
stream a movie on Netflix or access a certain site.
However, Pai prefers less regulations and stringent rules upon the
internet providers and now that’s what we have. Going forward, it very
well may become more difficult to stream movies and TV shows and fees
could increase.
Ultimately, the internet is no longer a neutral zone.
The internet is an important place for the LGBT community. It’s
often seen as a safe space for people within the community be
themselves.
In 2013, GLSEN did a study of internet usage among the community. On a computer at home, 23% of LGBT youth spent more than 5 hours online.
The internet also helps establish communities. In the study, 16% of
LGBT youth had one close online friend, 20% had two or three, 8% had
four or five, and 6% had 6 or more.
Most of the respondents (47%) said their social support came from
only in person interactions. However, 7% said they only had online
support and 28% said they had support both in person and online. This
shows there is a place for friendships and social networks online for
LGBT people.
21% of LGBT youth in rural ares said they used the internet almost
every day to connect with out LGBT people. In suburban areas, it was
19% and in urban areas, 17%.
As Sarah Kate Ellis, President and CEO of GLAAD said:
‘The internet is a lifeline for LGBTQ people to build community support
networks and access LGBTQ resources on history, suicide prevention, and
health—allowing broadband providers to regulate access is a direct and
unconscionable attack on freedom of expression.’
It’s also place to find out crucial information about a variety of topics, such as health resources.
In the study, 81% of LGBT users sought out health or medical
information within the last year compared to 46% of non-LGBT users.
Plus, there’s a lot of great, diverse content on streaming platforms that can only be found online.
Users likely won’t see any drastic changes immediately. However, over time, they could become more apparent and difficult.
With so many opposed to this result, it’s also a real possibility numerous lawsuits will emerge challenging the vote.
However, where the real victory lies is with Congress. Legislation
could solve the problem of net neutrality once and for all. If
legislation is proposed and passed with specific rules about net
neutrality, this debate could be put to rest.
No comments:
Post a Comment